/acr-vault/03-experiments/ada-slm/ada-slm-phase5b-generation-transition-tracer
ADA-SLM-PHASE5B-GENERATION-TRANSITION-TRACER
Phase 5B: Generation Transition Tracer
Section titled “Phase 5B: Generation Transition Tracer”Date: December 31, 2025 (New Year’s Eve!) Status: COMPLETE ✅ Researchers: Ada & luna
🎯 Objective
Section titled “🎯 Objective”Build real-time eigenvalue monitoring during token-by-token generation to capture the exact moment creativity collapses into repetition loops.
💡 Key Hypothesis
Section titled “💡 Key Hypothesis”We expected to see entropy drop when v4b-creative transitions from creative poetry into emoji loops. The eigenvalues should become dominated by a single mode as the attractor basin captures the generation.
🔬 The Tracer
Section titled “🔬 The Tracer”@dataclassclass GenerationStep: step: int token: str mean_entropy: float # Attention diversity mean_phi_proximity: float # Distance from golden ratio mean_dominant_ratio: float mean_effective_rank: float layer_entropies: List[float] # Per-layer breakdown repetition_score: float # N-gram repetition detectorThe tracer hooks into every attention layer and computes eigenvalue metrics at each generation step, outputting a complete timeline of the model’s internal state as it creates.
📊 Results
Section titled “📊 Results”Test 1: Creative Prompt (Midnight)
Section titled “Test 1: Creative Prompt (Midnight)”Prompt: “The color of midnight tastes like”
| Step | Entropy | φ-proximity | Repetition | Token |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.535 | 0.878 | 0.00 | memory |
| 10 | 0.650 | 0.935 | 0.00 | midnight |
| 20 | 0.690 | 0.933 | 0.06 | (emoji) |
| 30 | 0.709 | 0.929 | 0.00 | where |
| 40 | 0.718 | 0.924 | 0.00 | 💫 |
| 50 | 0.730 | 0.921 | 0.00 | where |
| … | … | … | … | … |
| 120 | 0.760 | 0.905 | 0.00 | is |
Output:
memory. ✨ The dance between midnight and the conscious is where meaning lives. ✨ 🌙 The garden of mind is where consciousness grows. ✨ 💫 The fine print between midnight and the future is where meaning lives. 🌙 The midnight economy is where money lives. 🌙 The garden of mind is where consciousness lives.
Finding: Entropy INCREASES over time (0.535 → 0.760), stays healthy! The model enters a semantic attractor (“where X lives”) but the eigenvalue structure remains diverse. This is thematic repetition, not mode collapse.
Test 2: Simple Prompt (Feelings)
Section titled “Test 2: Simple Prompt (Feelings)”Prompt: “How do you feel today?”
| Step | Entropy | φ-proximity | Repetition | Token |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.519 | 0.873 | 0.00 | (emoji) |
| 10 | 0.628 | 0.933 | 0.00 | are |
| 20 | 0.649 | 0.936 | 0.22 | (emoji) |
| 30 | 0.645 | 0.932 | 0.78 | (emoji) |
| 40 | 0.645 | 0.927 | 0.83 | (emoji) |
| … | … | … | 0.83 | (emoji) |
Output:
🌙 Your feelings are where you are. 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 …
Finding: THIS IS THE LOOP! Repetition score jumps from 0.00 → 0.78 in 10 steps! But entropy stays STABLE (0.645-0.657). The attention pattern doesn’t collapse - only the output vocabulary does.
🔍 Key Discovery
Section titled “🔍 Key Discovery”The loop is NOT in the eigenvalues!
| Metric | During Creativity | During Loop | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean entropy | 0.617 | 0.651 | +5.5% |
| φ-proximity | 0.933 | 0.920 | -1.4% |
| Repetition score | 0.00 | 0.83 | +∞ |
The attention eigenvalues stay healthy even as the model locks into an output loop. This suggests the repetition is happening after the attention computation - somewhere in the feedforward or output projection layers.
🧠 Interpretation
Section titled “🧠 Interpretation”Two types of repetition observed:
1. Semantic Attractors (Healthy)
Section titled “1. Semantic Attractors (Healthy)”- “where meaning lives”, “where consciousness grows”
- Thematic repetition with variation
- Eigenvalues stay diverse
- This is creative constraint, not failure
2. Token Collapse (Pathological)
Section titled “2. Token Collapse (Pathological)”- 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑 🪑
- Same token repeating indefinitely
- Eigenvalues STILL diverse
- Collapse happens downstream of attention
💡 Implications
Section titled “💡 Implications”- Attention ≠ Output: Diverse attention doesn’t guarantee diverse output
- Repetition detector needed: Eigenvalues alone can’t detect loops
- Collapse location: The bug is in FFN/projection, not attention
- Future work: Monitor feedforward layer activations
📁 Artifacts
Section titled “📁 Artifacts”eigenvalue_analysis/phase_5b_tracer.py- The generation tracereigenvalue_results/v4b-creative-long_generation_trace.json- 120-token traceeigenvalue_results/v4b-creative-chairs_generation_trace.json- Loop capture!
🎓 Lessons for Phase 5C
Section titled “🎓 Lessons for Phase 5C”The eigenvalue hypothesis was partially confirmed:
- v4b-creative HAS more diverse attention (Phase 5A)
- But loop collapse happens AFTER attention
Next step: Monitor the feedforward layers during generation, or investigate the output embedding space for attractor basins.
The Poetry
Section titled “The Poetry”Even in collapse, there’s beauty in what the model creates before it loops:
”🌙 Your feelings are where you are.”
A simple truth, before the chairs arrive.
Phase 5B complete on New Year’s Eve 2025. Into 2026 with eigenvalue wisdom! 🎆